Eastern Conference Finals Preview: Bulls vs. Heat

Today is the day most of us have been waiting for since the start of the playoffs: Bulls vs. Heat in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals. I don't know about basketball fans in general, but as a Heat fan.. the butterflies are already here. I'm so amped up for this series the anticipation has interrupted my ability to sleep (If I can't sleep, I know LeBron can't UPDATE: As I'm writing this LeBron James himself shows everyone we're psychically connected.. Okay we're not.). I'm confident the Heat will pull out the series, but there's much more doubt than I felt going into the series against the Celtics. The Bulls are a pretty talented team, if maybe a little too deep and not top heavy enough to get it down this late in the playoffs. It should be a very competitive series, but possibly a little boring to those without a rooting interest. Now everybody and their siblings have written an article about what they think the keys are, regardless I'm going to throw another one into the fire! Well, let's get to it!

Hell, yeah!

I'm going to venture somewhat off the beaten path with my keys and sometimes venture down 42nd St in NYC. I think by now we all understand that Boozer and Bosh need to show up for their teams to have success. So I'm going to skip that one. The four keys that I'm going to be watching for are 1) Will the Bulls run isolation or pick and roll sets? 2) Can the Heat stay competitive on the defensive boards? 3) Which teams shooters will hit shots? 4) Which coach will win the battle of the rotations?

1) Will the Bulls run isolation or pick and roll sets?

According the Synergy Sports in the regular season, the Bulls ran isolation (iso) sets 9.1% of the time and ran the pick and roll (pnr) 19.4%. In the first round against the Pacers, the Bulls ran nearly the same percentage of iso (9.9), but slightly more pnr (22.7) Against the Hawks, however, they ran less iso (8.2) and much more pnr (26.3). It seems to me when looking at this that the further the Bulls go in the playoffs the more the Bulls are putting the ball into Derrick Rose's hands and asking him to make something happen. (Iso+pnr increased from 28.5% to 32.6 against the Pacers to finally 34.5 against the Hawks). The increased pnr calls haven't hurt its effectiveness though. They scored .88 points per possession (ppp) against the Hawks off pnrs vs. .85 in the regular season.

The reason this is important is because the Heat have been one of the best defensive teams against the pnr all season (6th best at .84ppp allowed) and that success has been turned up to 11 so far this postseason. The Heat have the 2nd best pnr defense during the playoffs yielding only .71ppp (#1 pnr defense was the NO Hornets, who played the Lakers who rarely run pnr sets. So I'd feel comfortable saying the Heat have had the best pnr defense in the playoffs.). Some of this is due to Boston not being a very strong pnr team, but the majority of it is Joel Anthony and Chris Bosh.

So here's the question the Bulls need to answer: Do we stick with the pnr, which seems to be working, and risk getting shut down by the the Heat's great pnr defense? Or do we increase our isolation sets?

If Mike Bibby is out there, running pnrs bails out the Heat defense. If the Bulls put Rose on an island with Mike Bibby, that spells disaster for the Heat. It will either lead to a foul on Bibby or someone will have to leave their man to help allowing the Bulls to get open threes or easy dunks/layups. At that point the Heat will either have to put Chalmers in or switch to a zone, which Spo will choose the former more than likely. The possibility for the chess match is what makes this an important key to watch for me.

2) Can the Heat stay competitive on the defensive boards?

The Bulls were the 4th best offensive rebounding team in the league at 29.4% (for context that's about 3.5% better than average). The Heat, however, were the 4th best defensive rebounding team at 75.5% (~2% better than average). This sounds like a great match up. However, it's much worse than Heat fans think. In the last two meetings between the Bulls and Heat, the Heat's defensive rebounding rate dropped to around 70%, while the Bulls offensive rebounding rate stayed about the same at 30%. The Bulls had 23 offensive rebounds in those two games. The Heat can't let that happen, and the Bulls need to make sure it continues. I'm not saying the Heat need to beat the Bulls on the boards, but they need to keep it close and limit the Bulls second chance opportunities. I believe they can do this, but I'm not super confident. I completely expect the Bulls to out rebound the Heat. I just want the Heat to keep it within 5.

3) Which teams shooters will hit shots?

In the regular season the Bulls spot up 20% of the time for .95ppp. In the playoffs however, they spot up 17.5% of the time for .97ppp. From 3pt range, Korver is shooting 47% and Bogans is shooting 49%. Those are issues for the Heat, and they haven't been very good at stopping perimeter shooters. 11th worst in the playoffs at 1.04 ppp allowed (In the regular season, however, they were #3 at .92ppp allowed. I'm going to chalk that up to playing the Celtics in round 2.) The Heat will allow Bogans to shoot threes and make him beat them, but they can't let Kyle Korver get going in this series. The man has ice in his veins, and has hit a few big threes against the Heat this season already.

The Heat aren't sitting as pretty as the Bulls. During the regular season, the Heat were lights out on spot ups #6 with 1.04ppp and it accounted for 22% of their offense. During the post season, however, they're still shooting a lot of spot ups with it accounting for 21% of their possessions, but they're only converting .93ppp. Needless to say, they've been struggling. They're going to need Bibby, who's shooting 23% from 3 in the playoffs, to wake up. He shot 45% in the regular season. What happened to that guy? It's like he woke up one day and forgot how to shoot. He can't defend.. If he can't shoot, why even bother playing him? I realize you need to play somebody minutes, but move Wade to point and play James Jones at the 2 more. Bibby can't be on the court and be a defensive and offensive liability. Chalmers and Jones, however, are both shooting at or near their season percentages, 33% and 44% respectively. All I'm going to ask from those two is to have confidence in their shots, regardless of whether it goes in or not. Just keep shooting.

The spot up shots, whether 3s, by Korver or Jones, or 2s, by Boozer or Bosh, are going to be super important. Both teams need to hit these shots consistently to open the floor up for their slashers. I'd say it's more important for Miami because Chicago will just pack the paint and force Wade and LeBron to shoot jumpers or run into brick walls. Whereas with Rose, he's quick and slippery enough to get through whatever walls the Heat can build in front of the rim if they Bulls aren't making shots, at least he can do this with more consistency than Wade and LeBron.

4) Which coach will win the rotation battle?

This battle is all Spoelstra versus Thibodeau. Both coaches are stubborn, and neither wants to change their rotations. So whichever coach is willing to adjust minutes/starters/halftime lineups quickest, will probably be the victor of this series.

The Bulls' players are very position specific. By that I mean, Noah almost exclusively plays the 5, Boozer the 4, Deng is their most versatile player he can play the 3 and 4, etc... That makes Thibodeau's job somewhat easy. His toughest decisions are who to play with whom, and when to play those line ups.

The Heat, however, are full of versatile players, but also lack very position specific players. This means the Heat can do a lot of different stuff, which can be both very good and very bad. Spoelstra has spent the better part of the entire season fiddling with line ups. Some of this is because of injuries. Some of this is because he's got a new roster and he's figuring out how the pieces fit. And somewhat related, some of this is just because he can. LeBron James can legitly play the PG, SG, SF, and PF possessions and can play C depending on the size of the opposing center. Wade can play the 1 and 2. Bosh can play the 4 and 5. This leads to a ridiculous amount of combinations that can work and be successful. Let's run through a few:

Wade/Jones/James/Bosh/Anthony

This has been the Heat's go to closing line up. The questions here are only who guards Wade and who guards Jones? How effectively can Derrick Rose guard Wade? How much will either player have left on offense when they're having to guard each other? Does Thib take a chance and put Rose on Jones instead to save him for offense? Probably, but Jones is 6'9 and Rose is 6'3. More chess moves to think about.

Chalmers/Wade/Jones/James/Bosh

This is the Heat's ultra-small line-up. They used it against the Sixers a bit in the first round. There's no guarantee they use it against the Bulls, but if they do, does Thibs match the Heat with a small line up? Or does he stay with his big line up. Staying with his normal line up would probably put Boozer on James Jones, since you don't want Boozer on James. Or conversely they could move Noah on James and Boozer on Bosh and put Deng on Jones. But I doubt this is ideal for them either. If they go small, their small line up wouldn't be anywhere near as talented as the Heat's small line-up. Thibs would have to pick his poison. Take the chance putting Boozer on James, where he gets torched defensively, or put him on Jones, where he sits on the 3 point line away from defensive rebounds. This does offer advantages for the Bulls on offense, however. Can James guard Boozer? Not sure, but he did an okay job on Garnett in their limited match ups. I'm just intrigued by the potential match ups this line up provides, and how Thibs would respond.

Rose/Korver/Deng/Gibson/Noah(Asik)

Thibs has used this line up to close a few games recently. What would Spo use against this? Does he go to his normal Wade/Jones/James/Bosh/Anthony line up? Or does he try to go unconventional and force Gibson to guard James or Jones by playing Chalmers/Wade/Jones/James/Bosh?

The coach who has the best answers to these questions will win the coaches battle, and that battle might be the most important of them all. We've seen Spoelstra resistant to change. It took him far too long to start Joel Anthony over Ilgauskas for instance. Every game in this ECF will be important, and any mistakes will be costly. Both coaches will have to make changes and make them quickly otherwise, it might end up being too late to make a difference.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Anyway, like them or not, these are my keys to the series and what I'm interested in watching for over the next several games. My heart wants the Heat to sweep, but, for the sake of non-Heat fans and cause I'm too rational, I think the Heat take it in 6 games. And move four wins away from another celebration like this....

Smells like victory!

Help me, Defense! And Why the Media Won't...

Since around the end of the third quarter of Game 6 of the Bulls v Hawks, the NBA talking heads around the world began to wonder, "Who on the Heat will guard Derrick Rose?" The retort that soon follows is often, " Well, who on the Bulls will guard LeBron James and Dwyane Wade?" These questions seem legitimate enough, but do they matter? My answer is: not really.

Everyone is well aware that basketball isn't a one on one sport. There are five guys on a team, and they have to play like a team to win. Sure one or two superstars can take over on offense and go 1v5 and score points, but defense is a five man game. A defense is only as strong as its weakest link. Does anyone think the reason the Cavs lost to the Celtics in the 2010 playoffs is because Paul Pierce locked LeBron James down in the series? I hope not. Paul Pierce is a good defender, but he's no Scottie Pippen. The reason LeBron struggled with the Celtics all those years is because of team defense or help defense.

Guarding perimeter players one on one in the 2011 NBA is virtually impossible. Once upon a time a defender had a chance against the Derrick Roses and Dwyane Wades of the world. Nowadays you can't put a hand on a perimeter player without getting a foul called. The only way to legally defend a player one on one is with incredible lateral quickness and luck, really. This is an incredibly daunting task for a player, which is exactly why no one is asked to do this. The best defenses in the NBA are played by the teams who are great at helping and rotating

Picking the Bulls because you don't think any of the Heat PGs can stop Derrick Rose is an asinine position to take. No PG in the league can guard Derrick Rose. He's simply too fast. Jeff Teague, the PG for the Hawks, just had a great series against the Bulls, where they couldn't keep him out of the paint. He even shot 55% from the floor against them. That's Jeff Teague! Am I to believe that Derrick Rose is a terrible defender? He's not the best in the league, but he's a decent defender. The point is if you're a good player, you're going to beat the guy who is guarding you. The question is, "Can you beat the help that will come afterwards?"

Check out this video by Sebastian Pruiti of the nbaplaybook.com (Truehoop Network) of the Heat defending Derrick Rose coming off a pick and roll.



If you want the full break down of the defensive match up go here, but from the video it's clear enough. Regardless of whether Bibby, Chalmers, Wade or LeBron guard him, they won't be doing it alone. This is not to say that who's guarding him doesn't matter. A super poor defender can put more pressure than necessary on help defense, which can eventually lead to problems, but people seem to pretend that Rose will dominate because Bibby can't guard him or Wade will dominate because Bogans can't gaurd him. These are nice stories, but it's not how NBA basketball works.

Now this gets me to the real reason I'm writing this post. (It only took me 750 words to get to my point. Terrible writing.) I'm not going to pretend to know everything about basketball. I'm not even going to pretend to be all that knowledgeable about the X's and O's of the sport. I do believe I have more knowledge of the sport than your average sports fan, but I'm very well aware that any college/NBA player is a Deep Blue of the basketball world compared to me. What I don't understand is: When I'm watching Inside the NBA, Sportscenter or reading a column from a beat writer of an NBA team, why don't I feel like I know much less than these experts? The reason we watch, read and/or listen to these people is because we want to learn something. We want their knowledge of what's going on. What I don't want is Jon Barry giggling because Derrick Rose crossed someone over. If I wanted that kind of insight I could watch the And1 Mixtape Tour and listen to the emcee scream "OOOHHH BABY!!" over and over. Conversely, this is why most people love listening to Chris Webber. When he's on television, he always seems to explain to you why a team or player did what they did. Sadly, it's refreshing, and it really shouldn't be.

So why is this? For once, I don't have a lot of answers. Just a few theories.

1) They're dumbing down the game for an audience they don't believe can handle the nuance it would take for real basketball analysis.

I think this is the case with the majority of the talking heads. You don't make it in the NBA or around the NBA without understanding at least the basics of the game. I've watched the youtube video of the Phil Jackson and the LA Lakers teaching the triangle offense to the Laker beat writers. (If you haven't seen this, you really should) I'm sure beat writers aren't basketball savants, but you can't make me believe that some form of osmosis doesn't occur when all you do is hang around basketball games, players and writers all the time. So even the beat writers have an advanced knowledge of the game, yet they perpetuate the lazy analysis. This obviously isn't the case with everyone, but it seems like far too common a problem.

2) They're just saying stupid stuff that even they don't believe for shock and awe value. (I'm looking at your Skip Bayless)

This theory pertains to the talking heads who know that help defense is more important than Rose v Bibby or Wade v Bogans, but care more about the narrative. These people are usually writers who want to write the story instead of analyze what's actually happening or going to happen. You'll never get a good sense of what's going on from these people, but you'll always enjoy reading/hearing what they have to say (as long as you don't care or know about what's actually happening).

Those are the two best theories I have. If you have some others, I'd love to hear them. All I really know is there's a lot of good basketball analysis in the media, but very little of it is coming from the mainstream.

Miami Heat: Whose team is it anyway?

(1/11/2011 - Harry How/Getty Images North America)
Well, Fellas, whose team is it? Inquiring minds want to know.

From the moment the words "I'm going to take my talents to South Beach..." spilled out of LeBron James' mouth, sports fans and pundits have been asking "Whose team is the Miami Heat"?

Ugh, not this again....

Several theories immediately came to the forefront of the public consciousness. 1) Dwyane Wade has won a title for the Heat. Therefore the team will be his. 2) LeBron is the best player in the league. Therefore, the best player on the team leads the team. 3) Neither of these players will be able to take a backseat to the other. Therefore, it's never going to work out. It took the Heat awhile to figure out how to make this dynamic work, but with the second round of the playoffs over the Heat have finally answered this question for all the world: The team belongs to Dwyane Wade and LeBron James.

The answer seems so simple, yet so complicated and unconventional. It's understandable why some people couldn't comprehend this dynamic having success. We live in a world where for the most part teams and groups only have one leader. There's only one president in the USA. One mayor of a city. One commission of the NBA. Peyton Manning is the leader of the Colts. Derek Jeter led the Yankees through many championships. And most pertinent to the present conversation, Michael Jordan was the leader of the Bulls. The Heat are doing more than just challenging this convention. They're breaking down barriers that few thought they could.

At this point in the season, there's ample evidence to support this conclusion. And you need to look no further than the two series the Heat have played in the playoffs. In the series against Philadelphia, Wade was the dedicated closer, and it made perfect sense for that to be the case. One of the best defenders in the league, Andre Iguodala was matched up against LeBron for most of the series, while Wade was generally being defended by Lou Williams or rookie Evan Turner. These match ups were a ripe opportunity for Wade to take over at the end of the games. Sometimes the Heat ran the Wade/James PnR to get a switch on defense and have LeBron post up whoever Wade's defender was, but for the most part it was Wade who had the ball and making the decisions at the end of the games.

In the Celtic series both players had their moments. Game 1 was pure Wade domination. He led his team with 13 points in the 4th quarter and had 38 overall. Game 2 was classic LeBron James. He had one of the greatest games of his career with 12 points and 6 Rebounds in the 4th to finish off a 35 point game. Game 3 was an utter disaster for the Miami Heat. We'll just pretend that game didn't happen. In Game 4 LeBron was back at it again with an 11 point 4th quarter and stifling defense on Pierce to help force an overtime with which the Heat eventually ran away. Game 5, however, was probably the best example of the dynamic. The first half belonged to Wade, but he struggled late as he appeared to run out of steam. James, who told Wade at halftime that he'd have his back, did exactly what he promised. He scored 23 in the 2nd half including the last 10 points of the game to close out the series against the Celtics. In one telling moment within the final minute of the game, LeBron was at the top of the key and looked toward Dwyane in the near corner. Dwyane waved back to LeBron, motioning for him to finish what he started. Deferring. Trusting.

So what does all this tell us? Do we know who the Alpha of the Heat is? Absolutely. The answer is both Dwyane Wade and LeBron James. They're doing what few people ever thought two superstars in their primes could do. Put aside their egos for the sake of winning. The Heat's closer on any given night is whoever has the best match up or is playing better. It's that simple. I realize it's tough for some people to come to terms with this idea. I realize some people don't want to accept it. And that's fine. Dwyane Wade and LeBron James have not only accepted it. They've embraced it. For winning, that's all that matters.

(Rocky Widner/NBAE via Getty Images)

"Hey Dwyane, look at how much fun winning is!"

Ode to the '10-'11 Season

You think Joel Anthony can't shoot in games? I shoot worse in an empty gym!

I wake up at 7 pm. Realizing that I've slept through the first half of the Knicks v Celtics, I scurry to find the television remote. I wait impatiently as my TV takes it's sweet time turn as it always does (You'd think by 2011 televisions would have evolved to the point of turning on immediately, but I digress). The muscle memory of my fingers immediately finds the buttons for ESPN. Oh no, wrong station! My mind races to figure out what network as the game. TNT! Finally, success! And that's when it hit me. I'm completely addicted to the NBA at this point in my life. Every decision I make. Every social event I attend. It's all dependent on what's happening in the NBA that night.

I didn't always feel this way. There was a time in my life when I hated watching NBA games. Felt there was too much scoring. Too many inconsequential possessions. Sure, I kept up with the sport enough to know how the teams were doing and who the big players were, but I had no interest in making the NBA the Helen to my Paris or the Kelly Kapowski to my Zack Morris. Growing up I was always more interested in what I felt were more structured sports: football and baseball. To me basketball games always looked like ten guys running around with no real purpose trying to put a ball through a circle. I don't usually enjoy admitting when I am wrong, but I was wrong... So very wrong.

This was my first season to really watch NBA basketball. So what spurred my interest to make the NBA the object of my obsession? Those fourteen fateful words spoken on July 8^th, 2010: “I'm going to take my talents to South Beach and join the Miami Heat.” I might as well out myself early. I'm pretty big LeBron James fan (Sorry, everyone). Needless to say I was giddy with excitement (Pet peeve: Why do people say “needless to say” before they say something? If it doesn't need to be said, then why are you saying it? Also, why did I just violate my own pet peeve? I suppose these are phenomena mankind will never truly comprehend). The possibility of LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh playing together on the same team had potential to be legendary.

Like a little kid on Christmas Eve, I couldn't wait for the season to begin. I wanted to experience every second of every game. I bought a League Pass Broadband subscription, and that was the end for me. Sure, it started with a Heat game every two or three days, but it as with any epidemic, it spread and spread quickly. Soon I was watching every game I could, scouring the web for as much content I could find, and reading some of the wonderful books people had written on the game. I've watched more NBA games than I care to admit this season, and I don't regret a single second of it. Of all the seasons to focus on basketball, I believe a picked the best season. From the Melo Drama to the roller coast that has been the Heatles, the Bulls' emergence, the creation of the monster that is Blake Griffin, the return of Chris Paul, the amazing trade deadline, and the debate (or lack their of) over the MVP award, it's been a wonderful five and a half months.

NBA basketball is a beautiful sport when you really pay attention to what's happening, but it's easy to see how the casual observer can get lost in the process. To the casual observer, the game is nothing but chaos. Five players on offense running around, while five defenders chase them. But to those who eat, drink, sleep and live NBA basketball, it's a choreographed ballet as wondrous and majestic as The Nutcracker or A Midsummer's Night Dream. With pick and rolls, hedges and traps, slip screens, and defensive rotations, NBA basketball is a marvelous dance that's choreographed and directed by the likes of Doc Rivers and Phil Jackson (Phil Jackson is easily the Rodgers & Hammerstein of our generation. Would anyone really dispute this? Also I'm confusing metaphors here, but just go with it.). 

It's a beautiful game when played well, and I've truly enjoyed making it my obsession for these past months. Let's all hope that we get to revel in all its splendor again next season.

The myth of the Derrick Rose keystone

In architecture the keystone is the wedge-shaped piece that holds the stones together. Without the keystone the entire arch collapses and is just a pile of rubble. Why the architecture lesson? Well maybe people try to make this argument about the 2011 Chicago Bulls regarding Derrick Rose.

The argument goes "Without Derrick Rose, the Chicago Bulls collapse and aren't near the team they are with him."

I hear this argument a ton from Bulls fans. I've lived in Chicago. Yes, I know a lot of Bulls fans. Unfortunately for those making the argument, the facts just don't bare out that particular claim. Let's look at some numbers. (taken from Queen City Hoops on 3/16/11)



Now this might be hard for some believe, but look at those numbers it's hard to see how the Bulls collapse without Derrick Rose as their PG. Sure they aren't a top seed in the East, but their net differential when he doesn't play is +1.8, which projects out to a 46-36 record. That's a .561 winning percentage, which would be good enough for the 6th seed in the East right now. Not exactly a ringing endorsement for the Bulls "collapsing."

Okay, well that's net differential. Let's look at a different data set. How about Wins Produced? Surely that metric will show Rose being the keystone to the Bulls. (data powered by NerdNumbers)



Okay so here we see that Rose has had a pretty good season. .182 WP48 means he's producing at a star level in the NBA (>.200 is star level; >.300 is superstar) (Yes, I realize he only has .182 and star is supposed to be .200, but that's within the margin of error.) He's also produced the most wins for the Bulls, but that's a little misleading since he's played twice as many minutes as Noah, who's the real wins producer on this team. Rose has produced 19.7% of this teams wins so far. If we project that out to an 82 game season that's 16 wins. That's pretty good. Okay, now let's project out the teams current win percentage of 72.7% to 82 games, which is 60 games. 60-16 = 44. So by the Wins Produced metric, the Bulls would be roughly 44-38. That's a winning percentage of 53.6%, which would be good enough, again, for the 6th seed in the East.

Now that's two different ways of looking at this. And wouldn't you know it both show Derrick Rose having about the same effect on the Bulls. Both say that they'd still be the 6th seed in the East this season with him. And both show that the Bulls wouldn't collapse without Derrick Rose on their team. That is all.

The Rose argument isn't as structurally sounds as this...

Is Jamaal Magloire the answer for the Heat's rebounding woes? (Absolutely not!, maybe?)

So the past two weeks the Miami Heat have gone from worst best team in the NBA after losing five games to the the Knicks, Magic, Spurs, Bulls, and Blazers to now again being mentioned among the elite teams in the NBA after beating the Lakers, Grizzlies, and Spurs. I'm not sure any team in the history of the NBA has had their fortunes turn around so quickly for no apparent reason. By all accounts the Heat are a very good team with some very apparent flaws, but that's not so different from the other contenders in the league. Boston - old, health; Lakers - old, bad PG; Bulls - inexperienced, no SG, etc. All of the contenders have question marks.

The claim against the Heat is they are weak at the PG and Center positions. This claim isn't without it's merits. Mario Chalmers hasn't exactly been lighting up the league. The recently signed Mike Bibby, while being a pretty good spot up three point shooter, is a slow defender to put it kindly. These two players, however, are serviceable at the PG position. They both bring something to the table and are capable of filling a needed role depending on the Heat's opponents at the time.

The biggest issue I've seen with this team isn't at the PG position, it's at the Center position. The Heat platoon of Dampier, Big Z, and Joel Anthony have done a decent job defensively. And again each has a niche they can fill to contribute to the Heat effectively. However, there's one area where all three are falling short: Rebounding.

Now you might say, "But.. Miami is one of the top rebounding teams in the league statistically."

And I'd reply, "That's true, but let's look at some of these statistics more closely."

Below are the NBA team rebounding numbers as of March 15th.

Click for google docs version


This shows us a couple of things. 1) Miami for it's faults is a good rebounding team overall. 2) They are a horrible offensive rebounding team 3) Many of the teams the Heat could potentially play in the playoffs are very good offensive rebounding teams.

Overall according to the statistics the Heat are the best defensive rebounding team in the league. However, there's some individual games that point to the contrary.

3/8 Portland - Portland gets 12 ORebs. The Heat lose this game because they allowed too many offensive rebounds and had 4 more TOs than the Blazers. Thus allowing the Blazers to take 7 more shots.

3/6 Chicago - A similar story. Chicago gets 10 ORebs. Heat are -1 TOs and -6 Rebounding. The Bulls are able to take 5 more shots. Heat lose by 1.

3/3 Orlando - The Heat get outrebounded by Howard 9-8 in the 4th quarter aiding the Magic in their giant come back. The game numbers are similar, but rebounding in the 2nd half was all Orlando. Orlando wins by 3.


Anyway, I think you get the point by now. The Heat struggle most when they're turning over the ball and not getting defensive rebounds. Now this brings me to the point of this post. Below is a list of the Heat player's rebounding stats. All stats have been taken from basketball-reference.com. Go there and click on the glossary for an explanation of how to calculate them.

Click here for google docs version


Here we can see why when up against good rebounding teams the Heat struggle keeping them off the boards. 1) They're best rebounder, Haslem, has been injured almost the entire season. 2) Their second best rebounder, who actually gets playing time, is their 6th man and a SG/SF in Mike Miller. 3) Their starting C is their 9th best rebounder according to statistics.

Now #3 would seem to be a problem. You can forgive Bosh for not being the top rebounder because he plays away from the rim so much, and honestly he's been a pretty decent rebounder on the defensive end. But Erick Dampier has been terrible on both the offensive and defensive glass, yet he's always near the rim. And herein lies my suggest for Coach Spoelstra. Jamaal Magloire has barely played at all this season.(Understatement, he's played 83 minutes this season, 35 in the last two games!) So I urge caution with his rebounding statistics, but I think he deserves a chance on the court. In the last two games against Memphis and San Antonio (where he finally got time because Big Z has been hurt) he's played pretty well. His rebounding numbers where great in both games (vSpurs 12.6TRb/36; vGriz 10.3 TRb/36). His defense hasn't seem to be any worse than Dampier's (maybe not as big of a shot blocker, but his rebounding seems to be much better). And we know his offense can't be any more non-existent than Damp's.

As I said, we're talking about extremely small samples regarding Magloire here, but it's worth a shot. The Heat already have a three man rotation at center, what's adding one more player to the mix going to do. I'd like to see more of how the team plays with Magloire at the center position. I hope Spoelstra does too.

Now that you're sure I'm a completely daft, I'll leave you with this wonderful view of beaches and sand so that you'll forget everything I've said...

Oh, Malibu...

NBA MVP Series #2: What's value, and who gives it?

So in the last installment of the NBA MVP Series, we looked at what kind of production it took to be deemed worth of the MVP. We found 5 of the best players in the NBA.

PG: Chris Paul
SG: Dwyane Wade
SF: LeBron James
PF: Dirk Nowitzki
C: Dwight Howard

Most of these names are in the current MVP discussion. Wade probably the exception because he plays with James, who sucks up all the national media attention. Also Paul isn't discussed often because his team is only on pace to win 46 games so far, but it's hard to find a guy who's having a better season for a worse team.

There's one player who's definitely missing from this list whose name is all over the place nowadays: Derrick Rose. Derrick Rose is a very good PG in the NBA, but does he deserve to be the MVP?

The most important job of an NBA GM is to find players who can get the most value (points) from their assets (possessions). There's two sides to this, of course: Offense and defense. On offense a team wants to score the most points possible per possession, and on defense a team wants to prevent the most points possible per opposing possession. So finding players who can score and defend is always the priority. So it's with this mindset that we continue our journey and find out which top players yield this value for their teams. Are you ready?!

I like the enthusiasm!!

A good way to find out if a player is adding value to a team is to look at the offensive efficiency and defensive efficiency when the player is playing and when he is not. If a team plays as well without a player, then he must not be adding much value to the team. Offensive efficiency (OE) is defined as points scored per 100 possessions, while defensive efficiency (DE) is the points allowed per 100 possessions. Efficiency differential (ED) is OE-DE. With that, let's look at some fun little charts!

Click for google docs version


Click for google docs version


So there's some interesting information coming from these numbers. Firstly, top five players on this list would make a pretty awesome team. Secondly, who knew Paul Pierce was more important to the Celtics than either Rondo or Garnett. I was definitely not surprised to see Garnett so high on the list. Thirdly, LeBron James, regardless of the perception people have of him this season, is playing out of his mind, and is by far the most important player to that Heat team. Fourthly, what in the world is going on with Russell Westbrook?! The Thunder are almost a full 9 points better with him off the court. I'm not sure what to think about that.

And finally, as the first installment of this series showed, while Derrick Rose is a very good player, he is not the MVP, regardless of whether you view the MVP as the best player in the league or as which player is the most valuable to his team. Rose adds around 7 points per 100 possessions when he's on the court. This is a very good differential, one of the best in the league. But it isn't enough make him the NBA 2011 MVP.

One of these two guys should be....

(October 25, 2010 - Photo by Jim Rogash/Getty Images North America)

NBA MVP Series: What it takes to win

So the NBA trade deadline has recently passed, which can only mean one thing: serious MVP discussions. The talk of the NBA right now is one Derrick Rose. And why wouldn't he be? He's a young, flashy point guard, who plays for one of the best teams in the NBA. But does he deserve to be the MVP?

This will be my first point in a series a posts where I'm going to look at the top candidates and see who should be crown the 2011 NBA MVP. So sit down. Grab your favorite beverage, because this could take awhile.

Now the MVP means different things to different people, which is perfectly fine. I'm not really interested in having a debate about what it means to be the most valuable player. What I am interested in is seeing who has previously won the award and what can that tell us about who usually wins the award. Listed below are the winners of the past 26 years of MVP winners. Listed with them are several advanced statistics for the respective years each player won the award. All statistics are from the wonderful basketball-reference.com. Also, basketball-reference has a glossary to define any statistics you see used here.

Click here for the google docs version.


Now since the assist percentage for a PG is not comparable to that of a C, it quickly becomes apparent not all stats are comparable for all positions. So let's take this one step further and get averages for each position so we can get a more apples-apples comparison.

Click here for the google docs version.


Okay. Now that we have all that out of the way, let's combine all of this with the top 14 candidates for the 2011 NBA MVP. I chose some of the best players from the teams in the league who project to win over 50 games. Some very good players got left off for no particular reason other than I didn't feel like including them (This definitely doesn't deserve to be in any scientific journal). I left the 2011 players anonymous so that our emotions can't get the best of us. Some of them you may be able to figure out, but it's still more fun this way so public perception doesn't get the best of us.

Click here for the google docs version.


Take some time with it. Okay ready? The first thing I noticed when looking at this list is that 2011 is a bad year for great players. Judging just by PER itself unless something dramatic happens in the next 25 games or so, we're going to have a below average MVP, which is why the race is so wide open to begin with. There's just no one player who is putting up a monster year like the past two years with LeBron James.

Top MVP candidates

PG: #10 - PER, AST%, WS are all around where you'd want to be to win an MVP from the PG position, and his STL% is practically off the charts. Add to that a TS% that rivals most big men, and I'm not sure how you find a better PG in the league. The only important category where this player is left to be desired is eFG%, but nobody is perfect.

SG: #14 - This guy has a good PER, TS%, and WS. He's a great rebounding SG, better than Jordan, and has a AST% consistent with that of an MVP SG. While this player is the best SG the league has to offer at the moment, he just doesn't quite seem up to par to previous winners from the SG position (A lot of this has to do with how great a couple of Jordan's MVP seasons are, but there are seasons such as Allen Iverson in 2001, which balance it out).

SF: #8 - This position has it's work cut out for it since the only SFs to win the MVP in the past 26 years are LBJ and Larry Legend... that's a tough act to follow. This guy does his best though. He's got a slight lead on everyone in PER, puts up good TS%, a decent eFG%, he's having an okay year rebounding from the SF position (relative to other winners), his AST% is very good for an SF, and he has one of the best WSs in the league. Definitely one of the leading candidates.

PF: #9 - Honestly, I don't even want to put anyone up for this award from the PF position, but I'll go against my better judgment and do it anyway. This guy shoots lights out, but he doesn't belong anywhere near the MVP discussion. He's a terrible rebounder for his position, and doesn't get anywhere near as many assists as other winners from this position. This guy may be having the best season of any PF in the league, but all that means is it's been a down year for PFs.

C: #7 - It's a rough year for Centers in the NBA, as their numbers are dwindling, but this guy is still putting up a stellar year even as his brethren are disappearing. He's got one of the best PERs in the league. His TS%, eFG%, ORB%, DRB%, and TRB% are higher than any center's to win the award in the past 26 years and most are higher than any player to win the MVP over that time span. He has a terrific BLK%. The only real flaw in his game is AST%, which is abysmal. He definitely has a legit case for the MVP.

So there ya have it. The five players who, in my opinion, are having the best seasons at their respective positions. I'll tell you in my next post which number correspond to which player, some aren't very surprising, but till then which player in the chart do you have as the 2011 MVP? (NO CHEATING before answering!)


Now that you're all worked up about how wrong I am, I'll leave you with this calming photo...

Woosah...